Group strategic decision making: asynchronous GSS using structured conflict and consensus approaches

نویسندگان

  • Jerry Fjermestad
  • Robert M. Czech
  • Starr Roxanne Hiltz
  • Murray Turoff
  • Cameron Ford
  • Rosalie J. Ocker
  • Frederick Ferront
  • Malcolm Worrell
  • Kenneth Johnson
چکیده

This longitudinal experiment investigated the efficiency effectiveness and group member perceptions of dialectical inquiry (DI) and constructive consensus (CC) approaches to strategic decision making in an asynchronous (distributed) Computer-Mediated-Communications (CMC) environment. There were no dQ,%erences between DI and CC groups in terms of decision effectiveness. DI groups required signljicantly more asynchronous meeting time to complete their recommendations and had higher perceived depth of evaluation than CC groups. CC groups reported greater decision acceptance and willingness to work together again than DI groups. Relatively few experiential eflects were observed. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for Group Support Systems research and design. INTRODUCTION Research on face-to-face (FtF) groups has indicated that groups that try to reach consensus on a decision without following any specific procedures, often suffer “process losses” such as unequal participation, failure to generate and explore a number of options before reaching a decision, and a lack of critical examination of ideas. In FtF groups procedures such as brainstorming, Nominal Group Technique, and structured conflict procedures such as Dialectical Inquiry (DI) can decrease process losses and improve the outcomes of group decision making [29, 3 1, 321. In DI, the group as a whole is divided in half, with one subgroup charged with developing a plan or proposal, and the other sub-group charged with coming up with criticisms and a counter-proposal or counter-plan. Previous studies in the field of organizational strategic decision making have demonstrated that DI and similar structured conflict approaches, such as “devil’s advocate” (DA) procedures can improve the quality of decisions [22, 24, 3 1, 32, 331. To what extent do the findings about FtF groups apply to groups supported by computer based Group Cameron Ford Rosalie Ocker Frederick Ferront Malcolm Worrell Kenneth Johnson Department of Psychology Upsala College East Orange, New Jersey 0701.5 Graduate School of Management

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Conflict Management in Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus-Based Decision Making Approaches in a GSS Environment

Previous research in Dialectical Inquiry (DI), Devil’s Advocacy (DA) and Consensus (C) based approaches has primarily evaluated outcome variables such as the performance outcome quality, process and solution satisfaction and attraction to group. However, no prior study has looked at the process level variables such as the type and management strategies of conflict, nor the productivity of the c...

متن کامل

Improving group decision making: a fuzzy GSS approach

Group decision making methods such as Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) have been developed extensively, but their organizational use for group decision making has been difficult. According to Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem, one possible reason is that a group decision outcome could never satisfy every decision maker’s individual preference. This paper proposes a fuzzy GSS (Group Support Sys...

متن کامل

An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research

Group support systems (GSS) have been the subject of many investigations and meta-analyses over the past decade. This study presents, summarizes, and analyzes the results of 145 experiments that used communication mode as an independent variable. The results show that the modal outcome for GSSs compared to Face-to-Face (FtF) methods is ‘‘no difference,’’ while the overall percentage of positive...

متن کامل

Challenging Group Support Systems Research: The Case for Strategic Decision Making

Strategic decision making (SDM) often occurs in groups that can benefit from the use of group support systems (GSS). However, no comprehensive review of this logical intersection has been made. We explore this intersection by viewing GSS research through the lens of SDM. First, SDM is broadly characterized and a model of GSS-mediated SDM is produced. Second, we review empirical GSS research lin...

متن کامل

Using group support systems for strategic planning with the United States Air Force

Strategic planning is a critical part of establishing an organization’s direction. Although strategic planning is utilized throughout the United States Air Force today in various forms, group sessions can become time-consuming without structured planning and a focus on group communication. Computer-supported strategic planning, making effective use of technology, is one way to improve the strat...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1995